Pamela E. Lowry, Ed.D.
Georgian Court University
This paper examines current practices in implementing a Response to Intervention (RtI) in diagnosing specific learning disabilities. The use of the aptitude achievement discrepancy model, RtI model or a combination is reviewed. A survey of special education administrators in New Jersey compares methods of identification and consistency of application across districts. Findings indicate that few districts are currently implementing RtI along with the discrepancy model in determining eligibility with a specific learning disability. No district is using RtI as the sole determinant for this classification category. RtI models differ across districts with no consistency in interventions or screening tools.
To Read this Article - Left Click Here (login required)
To Download this Article - Right Click Here (login required)
(choose "save", "save target as" or "save as")
To Download the Entire Spring/Summer 2013 Issue of JAASEP - Click Here (login required)
AASEP MEMBERS LOGIN to Access live links to all available JAASEP issues.