Laura Kern, JD, Ph.D.
Heather Peshak George, Ph.D.
Lauren L. Evanovich, Ph.D.
Stephanie Martinez, Ph.D.
University of South Florida
The Supreme Court case of Endrew F. v. Douglas County District RE-1 (2017) has renewed interest in the Free and Appropriate Public Education (FAPE) mandate of the Individuals with Disabilities Act (IDEA). The court’s ruling expands the term “appropriate” to a consideration of progress for academics and behavior. This shift has significance to many who work with students with disabilities in schools. Specifically, special educators will need to ensure that they are assessing and monitoring academics and behavioral, such as incorporating functional behavior assessments (FBAs) into the development of appropriate behavior intervention plans (BIPs) and considering overall progress during Individualized Education Programs (IEP) development. This paper will address the history of IDEA, its connection with FAPE, and discuss the seminal cases of Rowley and Endrew F. and their implications for IEP teams. Considerations and recommendations for addressing FAPE for students will be provided, focusing on implications for the IEP, Multi-tiered Systems of Support (MTSS), and Behavior Intervention Plans (BIPs).
Keywords: Endrew F., IDEA, FAPE, behavior intervention plan, MTSS, IEP, special educators
To Read or Download this Article - Click Here (login required)
To Download the Entire SPRING-SUMMER 2019 Issue of JAASEP - Click Here (login required)
AASEP MEMBERS LOGIN to Access live links to all available JAASEP issues.
If you are a member of AASEP, please login to freely access this and all archived issues of JAASEP
If you are NOT A MEMBER of AASEP or NASET you may purchase this article for $4.95 (use the Buy Now button below):
OR - Buy the entire issue of JAASEP WINTER 2019 for $19.95 by using the Buy Now button below:
OR - Join AASEP Today and receive access to this and all past issues of JAASEP -